In order to get answers for these questions, he came to Socrates. First of all, Socrates has identified that the soul of a person is divided into three parts. The opposite of the rational part is the appetitive or irrational part, with which a person lusts, hungers, thirsts and gets excited by other appetites. Furthermore, Socrates provides an analogy between a person and a city-state.
It shows how we gain knowledge. Plato claims that truth from what we see and hear are not real knowledge, and that there is another way of finding the truth which is philosophical.
The allegory started with three prisoners tied up by a chain inside a cave where the fire behind them is the only source of light.
They didn't have any choice but to look at the wall in front of them where they only see shadows as reflections of the things outside the cave.
Because they were chained, they have decided to have a game which is to guess what shadows would appear next. The winner will be praised on how clever he is. The twist of tbe allegory was when one of the prisoners escaped and left the cave.
He was shocked on what the world outside of the cave is. As he begins to understand things, he realized that the world outside the cave is not real. After his intellectual journey where he discovered beauty and meaning, he returned to the cave and told the prisoners his discoveries.
They didn't believe him and told him that the world outside corrupted his way of thinking. They even threatened to kill him if he tries to set them free. The allegory really made me think hard after watching it. It made me contemplate on a lot of things. It also amazed me on how the minds of Socrates and Plato works.
It is a good representation on how a person should think or the kind of mentality that a person should have. A person's knowledge is not acquired only through the senses, the thruth should be found in a philosophical way. Not everything that we see and hear is the truth. People should learn how to think out of the box.
We should not conform ourselves to what is considered to be universal. There is no harm in trying to look for the answers in things that makes us wonder. Going out of what is viewed to be a norm would not mean that you are trying to break the rules.
Feeding our curiosity is not a bad thing because we are just fulfilling our desires as a natural human being who are born curious.- In this paper I will give an in depth analysis of Socrates argument in Plato’s Republic and in Plato’s Phaedo. First I will begin with the analysis of the Republic, a discussion between Socrates and Glaucon on morality of the human being.
Republic [Politeia] Plato. Greek philosophical dialogues, written c.
b.c. Regarded as Plato's most important work, the Republic has long been studied as a seminal text of the Western.
Reflection on: the “Republic,” by Plato. Greek philosopher, Plato, is considered to be one of the most influential people in Western Philosophy. The fact that he was a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle leaves no questions about his competence.
This paper will evaluate the quote from the “Republic” and provide a summary of a quote; provide a context from the text for the quote; and finally, it will include my own thoughts on the quote and the Socrates’s argument as a whole. Reflection on: the “Republic,” by Plato.
Greek philosopher, Plato, is considered to be one of the most influential people in Western Philosophy.
The fact that he was a student of Socrates and a teacher of Aristotle leaves no questions about his competence. - The Allegory of the Cave in Plato's Republic This paper discussed The Allegory of The Cave in Plato's Republic, and tries to unfold the messages Plato wishes to convey with regard to his conception of reality, knowledge and education.
Reflection, Utopia, Conditioning] Better Essays words | ( pages) | Preview.